Which should I choose between ultra-clear tempered glass and ceramic for the Nua table top options?
This is a question from a reader who wants to compare the differences between the two tabletop materials and their maintenance methods before making a decision when choosing the Nua table.
The Nua table has the identical base and leg structure, but you can choose ultra-clear tempered glass if you want clear color transmission, or the ceramic top if you want a dining table that is resistant to stains and easy to care for.
The two options to choose from for the Nua table by JACKSON CHAMELEON share the same base MDF, aluminum, and steel leg framework[1][2]. The difference lies in the nature of the topmost surface where dishes and hands touch.
The Tempered Glass tabletop focuses on transmitting the original color clearly. By using low-iron ultra-clear tempered glass, which reduces the greenish tint commonly seen in ordinary float glass, it shows clean colors without distortion[3]. Right beneath the glass, the same color as the high-gloss body is laminated, allowing calm shades to reflect up clearly through the tabletop[4]. While it is great for enjoying neat colors, the nature of glass material means that clattering sounds may occur when placing dishes, and fingerprints can remain, requiring frequent wiping.
On the other hand, the Ceramic tabletop puts weight on daily maintenance and practicality. It was baked for 2 hours to be firmly compacted[5], and obtained CTI certification with a low water absorption rate of less than 0.05%[6]. Because foods like seasonings or coffee do not seep into the surface gaps, it is easy to wipe away lightly with a dishcloth.
hmmm, if you want to fill your dining table with a transparent impression where clear colors shine through, ultra-clear tempered glass is suitable; if you want usability where you can set food comfortably without worrying about stains, ceramic is appropriate.
The exact thickness specifications for the tempered glass and ceramic tabletops have not been confirmed yet.