When the color tones of the photos worn by a model and the standalone product photos look different, which one should be used as the reference?
When looking at clothes online, there are moments of hesitation because the color tones look different between the wearing photos and standalone photos due to lighting or outdoor light. This is to determine which photo to gauge the color and detailed finish closer to the actual item.
When gauging the natural color tone and detailed finish of the clothes, checking based on the product images capturing the clothes themselves, rather than the styled model wearing shots, is closest to the actual appearance.
Model photos show the mood when worn, and standalone product photos show the actual item of the clothing.
AMOMENTO states that the actual color and specific details are closest to the standalone product images rather than the model wearing images[1][2]. The reference is the product photos. In model wearing shots, the color tone of the fabric easily appears different from its original tone depending on natural light, surrounding backgrounds, and spatial styling. In addition, finishing structures such as seams and stitches can be shadowed by wrinkles or body angles formed while wearing.
On the other hand, standalone product shots are photographed with the clothes laid out under uniform lighting, so they reveal the original tone and texture without alteration. While the silhouette and mood when worn can be examined in the model shots, looking closely at the standalone product shots to check the fabric color, buttons, and closure condition before making a final decision is the way to reduce differences from the actual item.
hmmm, it is sufficient to read the mood of the clothes through wearing shots and check the reality of the clothes through product shots.





Specific environmental standards regarding the types of lighting applied or outdoor natural light conditions during the shooting of wearing shots and product shots have not yet been confirmed.
Product measurements
View details
Basic oversized shirt, White
Measurements
| Part | 0 | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 총장 | 79.3cm | 80.3cm |
| 어깨너비 | 52.7cm | 53.7cm |
| 소매길이 | 55.8cm | 56.8cm |
| 가슴단면 | 56.8cm | 59.3cm |
| 밑단단면 | 58.4cm | 60.9cm |
Floral slim shirt, Grey
Measurements
| Part | 0 |
|---|---|
| 총장 | 56.5cm |
| 어깨너비 | 40cm |
| 소매길이 | 61.2cm |
| 가슴단면 | 42.5cm |
| 밑단단면 | 46.3cm |
Slim shirt, Mint
Measurements
| Part | 0 | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 총장 | 60.3cm | 61.3cm |
| 어깨너비 | 40.6cm | 41.6cm |
| 소매길이 | 60.9cm | 61.9cm |
| 가슴단면 | 42.2cm | 44.7cm |
| 밑단단면 | 46.6cm | 49.1cm |
Slim shirt, Red
Measurements
| Part | 0 | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 총장 | 60.3cm | 61.3cm |
| 어깨너비 | 40.6cm | 41.6cm |
| 소매길이 | 60.9cm | 61.9cm |
| 가슴단면 | 42.2cm | 44.7cm |
| 밑단단면 | 46.6cm | 49.1cm |
Velvet shirring pants, Khaki
Measurements
| Part | 0 | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 밑위 | 34.3cm | 34.9cm |
| 허리 ◦ | 34.3cm | 36.8cm |
| 허벅지 ◦ | 37.5cm | 38.7cm |
| 밑단단면 | 21.9cm | 24.4cm |
| 엉덩이 ◦ | 54.6cm | 56.1cm |
For rows marked with ◦, flat measurement or circumference could not be confirmed in official sources, so hmmm determined them using figures from the same item.
Other stated figures
| Part | 0 | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 길이 ◦ | 95cm | 96cm |
For rows marked with ◦, flat measurement or circumference could not be confirmed in official sources, so hmmm determined them using figures from the same item.